When do public policies influence citizens’ political attitudes and behavior, and among whom? We study this question using one of the largest social provision programs in the United States: the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). We exploit the staggered roll-out of state-level EITC programs to estimate the causal effect of the program on elections, voter behavior, and attitudes about the government.

Contrary to predictions from the policy feedback literature, we show that the credit leads to higher vote shares and approval ratings for the implementing governor. These effects are temporally limited to the first years of the credit’s availability and dissipate over time.

Taken together, our results offer new insights about the conditions under which particularistic economic policies affect political outcomes.

About the authors

Hunter E. Rendleman

Assistant Professor, Political Science

Jesse Yoder

Ph.D. Candidate in Political Science, Stanford University